Friday, June 16, 2006

Tharoor Conundrum!

I reckon the guys at South Block must have burnt the midnight oil several times in coming to a decision, for it was never going to be an easy one! Finally India has nominated Shashi Tharoor for the top UN job. At the outset let me wish Tharoor the best of luck! If foreign affairs correspondents were to vote, he might get elected unanimously! I guess he should be the most interviewed UN official ever! Apart from his diplomatic and literary credentials, I admire him for the guts he showed in criticizing the BJP govt's handling of Gujarat riots when conventional wisdom would have suggested keeping the Vajpayee government in good humor.

Firstly its unfortunate that member countries are now required to nominate candidates, which makes its a contest between nations. Selling Tharoor would have been a lot easier than selling India. Reasonable minds would have easily rejected Thai and South Korean politicians and it would have come down to choosing between two seasoned UN diplomats in Shashi Tharoor and Jayanth Dhanapala of Srilanka. But now the world capitals will be scratching their heads on the possibility of having an 'Indian' chief for the UN. With Pakistan widely expected to nominate its own candidate simply to add nuisance value, stakes are much higher for India now.

UN secretary generals have always been from low-key states. So should India, aspiring to be a top dog in the security council, gotten itself into the race now? I think yes. Not only is the SC expansion very unlikely in the near future, better if its late! Whenever SC is expanded, India would no-doubt be there. So why bother if Nigeria or South Africa gets in or not? More >>

However the jingoism about an Indian head for UN is unnecessary. Tharoor as UN chief is unlikely to bring any benefits to India. Infact this would put us in a spot over UN role in Kashmir besides weakening our resolve to keep UN out of other South Asian issues like Nepal and Srilanka which we consider to be our fiefdom. I thought somebody in MEA would be thinking about getting rid of the UN ceasefire monitoring group in the LOC. Apparently not. Besides Colombo would not be very happy with this development. Why not India put its weight behind Dhanapala? That gesture would have gone down well with all our neighbors. May be India would have done so had Kadirgammar been still alive and in the race.

Anyway what made India take the plunge? South block mandarins probably think that getting Tharoor elected will showcase India's sustained interest in the UN which could be used as a bargaining chip later on. The fact that India got elected with the most number of votes to the UN Human rights council recently would have encouraged them further. The apparent lack of a front runner amongst the three contenders and the availability of a strong candidate in Shashi Tharoor would have sealed the case. If we do manage to get Tharoor elected (which I think we will), all is well. If not, this would a very unnecessary loss of face.


sachin said...

That was a pretty good article. This is the attitude that got them into trouble in Kashmir. Had India not taken the issue to the UN, things would have been much better there.

By the way, I've posted a new article on my blog site that you may find interesting. Do take a look at it.

GuNs said...

Nuisance value, LOL. Well put.

I think we do not really need to go around garnering everybody's goodwill all the time by bending low. Bangladesh kills our soldiers on the border without provocation and we do nothing. I think its high time we tried to do something that proves to the world that we are no faggots !!


Balaji said...

Well..if Maleeha Lodhi is going to be the Pakistan's candidate, then they have more than nuisance value. Infact they may even have a Secratary General!

As for Bangladesh, what prevents us from finalising and fencing the border, throwing away illegal settlers and killing ulfa leaders there mossad style? Vote bank Politics! If I were a BDR general, I will kill Indians every minute just for fun.

Jokes apart, India doesn't have good relations with any of its neighbors. With this baggage, we will go nowhere in international diplomacy.


sachin said...

>>I think its high time we tried to do something that proves to the world that we are no faggots !!

Faggots? lol.

No, serioiusly, faggots? Faggots???

Anonymous said...

A rediff article on the same boring topic.

I can hear you saying "Itha thaan naan EN blogla appave elthitanay!"


Muse (# 5279076) said...

There is something common between you and I. For details visit my blog.